Daniel Greenfield article: With Blood on Their Hands Posted: 11 May 2013 08:56 PM PDT

---

WITH BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS – WHO BUT THIS ADMINISTRATION – IMPEACH AND CONVICT  PER RAY ALLEN — GOD , GUTS, OLD GLORY  and AMMO  05/12/13                                      08:56 Lady Macbeth may have been one of literature’s most famous villains, but at least she had the guilty conscience to eventually try and wash the blood off her hands. Even if by then it was much too late. via American Digest It is doubtful that Hillary Rodham Clinton will start hallucinating bloody spots on her palms during the book tour for her upcoming 14-million-dollar book or compulsively washing her hands during the 2016 campaign. If she does make it into the White House, it is even more doubtful that she will wander it at night in a nightgown crying out for the blood that can never be washed away. Lady Macbeth may have cried out, “Here’s the smell of the blood still; all the perfumes of Araby will not sweeten this little hand.” But the black perfumes of today’s Araby are more than enough to sweeten a multitude of appeasements and cover the blood that flows out from them. Real life villains are closer to Richard III than Lady Macbeth, offering to trade their stolen kingdom for a horse to the very end, rather than seeking some intangible repentance in a fit of remorse. They are more likely to ask what difference it makes; the solipsistic query of the sociopath to whom the feelings of others are abstract things. The Benghazi hearings featured more hypocritical and trite eulogies than anything Richard III could have imagined. Congressman Elijah Cummings told witnesses that “death is a part of a life.” A fact that they were surely unaware of. His colleague, Eleanor Holmes Norton asked, “What’s the big deal here?” “We had Benghazi I with Susan Rice, now we’re having Benghazi II with Hillary Clinton. Enough Benghazi,” Norton declared. It’s not quite “Out, damned spot!” or “What, will these hands ne’er be clean?” and more “What need we fear who knows it, when none can call our power to account?” The latter is a timeless villain’s truth, whether in a fictional 11th century Scottish castle or in the all too real 21st century Capitol Hill. For Lady Macbeth, power was not a sufficient defense against conscience. A thousand years later, in Foggy Bottom, Capitol Hill and at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue; there is no conscience, only power. The arrogance of an Obama, a Clinton or a Norton comes from their confidence that none can call their power to account. Norton and Clinton have more of a point than critics give them credit for. Benghazi isn’t a big deal. Not compared to the rivers of blood they shed in Afghanistan. In Benghazi, four Americans were abandoned. In Afghanistan, it was over 1500 soldiers killed and nearly 15,000 wounded many of them denied air support and the ability to fight back under rules of engagement that likely also played a part in the betrayal at Benghazi. Iosif Vissarionovich Stalin, a Shakespearean villain, if there ever was one, who helpfully wrote his own soliloquies, once said that while a single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic. The four deaths in Benghazi are also a tragedy. Though we must of course, as Congressman Cummings told us, put them into the context of death being a part of life. Afghanistan however is just a statistic. The day after Benghazi, the parents of Navy SEALS from Seal Team Six, along with military experts and former military officials, appeared at the National Press Club to demand a congressional investigation. The media responded with a collective shrugs and resumed providing non-stop coverage of the Jodi Arias case. Some Lady Macbeths go to prison. Others are meant to go to the White House. “Why was there no pre-assault fire?” Karen Vaughn, the mother of Navy SEAL Aaron Vaughn, asked. “We were told as families that pre-assault fire damages our efforts to win the hearts and minds of our enemy. So in other words, the hearts and minds of our enemy are more valuable to this government than my son’s blood.” “Why didn’t they take them out with a drone,” Charles Strange, the father of Michael Strange asked. “The Admiral told me, to win the hearts and minds. I says, to win the hearts and minds? How about my heart? How about my mind?” But not all hearts and minds are created equal. And not all blood is valued the same. If Lady Macbeth had wandered through her Foggy Bottom castle or the Westchester mansion, complete with wine cellar, artist’s studio and outdoor fireplace, mourning for a Muslim terrorist killed in a drone strike or a Muslim protester during the September 11 embassy attacks, that would have been a socially acceptable act of regret for a lost mind and heart that could have yet been turned to a moderate appreciation of a country where you can hate it, bomb it and still get an academic posting at Columbia University. But why bother mourning for one of the expendable human drones who are expected to give their lives to remind Muslims of our respect for their culture and religion? When a Muslim is killed by a drone, the media gathers its outrage, but when one of our soldiers or diplomats dies in the hopes of softening a Muslim’s heart, then the men and women who sent him to die with his hands tied and a target painted on his back cannot see the red spots on their soft palms. Muslim hearts and minds are the obsession of the policymakers of the dying West, but who cares about the hearts and minds of the men and women who ride Chinooks into danger zones, run marathons in cities where aspiring Chechen boxers feel marginalized and work in skyscrapers that Muslim students fly past on the way from Boston, except on Election Day? “Under the current Rules of Engagement, if the enemy fires on you then runs behind a rock,” Karen Vaughn told a press that was busy pressing its fingers into its ears as deep as they could go, “when he pops his head out from behind the rock, you’re not allowed to engage him unless you can verify that he has not laid his gun down… in other words you must be fired on twice.” Today it’s twice. Tomorrow it may be three times. And then four. The angrier they get, the more free shots we have to give them to improve their self-esteem and soothe the throbbing emotions in their hearts and minds. The press release for Hillary Clinton’s 14-million-dollar book declares that she “has redefined the meaning of ‘trailblazer’ in every phase of her career on the world stage.” Considering the ambassador she left choking to death on the smoke from a fire set by the militias she helped empower, that might not be the best choice of words. The unnamed book will offer “dramatic moments”, “vivid personal anecdotes” and “memories of her collaboration with President Obama and his National Security team.” Again, not the best choice of words. But all too apt. “Your face, my thane, is as a book where men may read strange matters,” Lady Macbeth advised her lord. But it isn’t likely that readers who plonk down their thirty bucks will read any strange matters in this sixth or seventh Clinton book. Those who have already endured “Living History” with her and “It Takes a Village”, not to mention “Dear Socks: Kids’ Letters to the First Pets” are unlikely to learn anything new from Hillary Clinton’s version of Decision Points. The books after all take the next part of Lady Macbeth’s murderous advice. “To beguile the time, Look like the time; bear welcome in your eye… But be the serpent under’t.” The time now is that of the successful career woman whose marriage may be a sham and whose career is littered with more bodies than Lady Macbeth could have aspired to in her most deranged fantasies, but who never lets that get her down or stop her from leaning in to offer some empowering advice for that big meeting. The serpent is still underneath. And sometimes it comes to the surface, asking what difference it makes it four people died here or fifteen hundred people died there. It’s been Benghazi I and Benghazi II and eventually Benghazi III and it’s time to MoveOn.org to discussing some offensive thing about the reproductive process that a Republican in Iowa or Idaho said. There will be no book titled, “Dear Hillary, I’m In a Burning Diplomatic Mission with no Security and Can’t Breathe: Dying Ambassador’s Letters to Former First Ladies” and no, “It Takes a State Department to Spend Money on Art in Embassies Instead of on Embassy Security” book either. Those books wouldn’t look like the time, they actually would be the time. They would be the bloody handprints on the wall and that would distract us from the Jodi Arias 2016 campaign. The families of Navy SEALS demanding answers will not receive a fraction of the coverage that Cindy Sheehan did for burping in Bush’s direction. American hearts and minds only matter when they are being influenced to stop fighting back against all the hate in Muslim hearts and minds. Soldiers will go on fighting and dying with their hands tied behind their backs. Embassies will go on being attacked. And nothing will be done about it because fighting back is insensitive and hurts our chances of winning Muslim hearts and minds. Lady Macbeth only wanted power, but she lacked an ideology that would allow her to believe that she was doing the right thing.  There was no Wellesley College senior thesis about Saul Alinsky on her shelf and she was left unequipped to believe that the ends justified the means and that rivers of blood could be spilled in a good cause. “If the ideals Alinsky espouses were actualized, the result would be social revolution,” Hillary Clinton wrote in her conclusion. The social revolution of her 1969 thesis is once again here, and like most revolutions, it’s a bloody mess. Once again social values are under attack by radicals while soldiers die overseas without being allowed to fight back. And the radicals care for nothing for the blood that they spill for their radical revolution. Not the blood of a single man or of a thousand men. “What is a traitor?” Lady Macduff’s son asks his mother, before being murdered by Macbeth’s assassins. “Why, one that swears and lies,” his mother replies. “Who must hang them?” her son asks. “Why, the honest men,” she answers. “Then the liars and swearers are fools,” he says, “for there are liars and swearers enow to beat the honest men and hang up them.” The liars and swearers have hung up the honest men from Benghazi to Kabul to Capitol Hill. And the traitors walk through the night with blood on their hands and do not even see. Daniel Greenfield is a New York City based writer and blogger and a Shillman Journalism Fellow of the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

Related articles

• Dem Delegate: ‘Enough Benghazi,’ ‘What’s the Big Deal Here?’ (nationalreview.com)
• Blood on Their Hands (frontpagemag.com)

WHAT IS AN INFIDEL ?

This is a true story and the author, Rick Mathes, is a well-known Leader in prison ministry ****************************** The man who walks with God always gets to his destination. If you have a pulse you have a purpose. The Muslim religion is the fastest growing religion per capita in the United States , especially in the minority races!! Last month I attended my annual training session that’s required for maintaining my state prison security clearance… During the training session there was a presentation by three speakers representing the Roman Catholic, Protestant and Muslim faiths , who each explained their beliefs. I was particularly interested in what the Islamic had to say. The Muslim gave a great presentation of the basics of Islam, complete with a video. After the presentations, time was provided for questions and answers then it was my turn. I directed my question to the Muslim and asked: ‘Please, correct me if I’m wrong, but I understand that most Imams and clerics of Islam have declared a holy jihad [Holy war] against the infidels of the world and, that by killing an infidel, (which is a command to all Muslims) they are assured of a place in heaven. If that’s the case, can you give me the definition of an infidel?’ There was no disagreement with my statements and, without hesitation, he replied, ‘ Non-believers! ‘ I responded, ‘So, let me make sure I have this straight. All followers of Allah have been commanded to kill everyone who is not of your faith so they can have a place in heaven. Is that correct?’ The expression on his face changed from one of authority and command to that of a little boy who had just been caught with his hand in the cookie jar. He sheepishly replied, ‘Yes.’ I then stated, ‘Well, sir, I have a real problem trying to imagine The Pope commanding all Catholics to kill those of your faith or Dr. Stanley ordering all Protestants to do the same in order to guarantee them a place in heaven!’ The Muslim was speechless! I continued,’I also have a problem with being your friend when you and your brother clerics are telling your followers to kill me! Let me ask you a question: Would you rather have your Allah, who tells you to kill me in order for you to go to heaven, or my Jesus who tells me to love you because I am going to heaven and He wants you to be there with me?’ You could have heard a pin drop as The Imam hung his head in shame. Needless to say, the organizers and/or promoters of the ‘Diversification’ training seminar were not happy with my way of dealing with the Islamic Imam, and exposing the truth about the Muslims’ beliefs. In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.S.. To elect the President! I think everyone in the U.S. Should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on! This is your chance to make a difference…. FOR CHRIST’S SAKE…..SEND THIS ON . .

Related articles

• Worlds Fastest Growing Religion (jpfinn7.wordpress.com)
• Were Navy SEAL Team 6 Members Condemned To Hell By Muslim Cleric During Funeral? (freedomoutpost.com)
• The Blaze Just Asking: Did Imam’s One Weird Prayer Damn Navy Seals To Hell At Their Own Funeral? (wonkette.com)
• Cleaning Islam of its Murderers (americanthinker.com)
• US military allows Muslim cleric to curse fallen US soldiers during a military funeral (countdowntozerotime.org)
• What is an Infidel (planet.infowars.com)
• Memory of SEALs Defiled at Their Funeral (moonbattery.com)
• The Promise of Islamic Betrayal (beowulfjournal.wordpress.com)

Time to Suspend Muslim Immigration, Muslims in the Military, and Building Mosques in the U.S.

I have and so has many Americans have called for this ,  We send their country’s money , they try to kill us. We help in times of natural disasters, they try to kill us. We let them in to what used to be our finest college’s , they try to kill us. Here we go again ,we will help the so-called rebels in Syria  with weapons , I will guarantee  they will try to kill us.No the progressive think if we play nice they will. Guess what it is Islam , Islam has a hatred of the world they want global domination , they want to kill us , I will say again they want to kill us . Look they love killing themselves ,they hate each other .

Thursday, May 2, 2013

Somebody has to be the first to say it.

It’s time, for the sake of the security of the United States of America, to  immediately suspend Muslim immigration, to preclude Muslims from service in our  military and to stop the building of mosques.

(The matters of Muslim military service and the building of mosques will need  to be subjects of future columns.) It should go without saying that I am  speaking just for myself here. But these possibilities must be addressed and  discussed in a sober fashion. The reality is that we will wind up doing these  three things out of necessity if we do not do them out of wisdom. We need to  make these adjustments before it’s too late rather than after it’s too late.

We should suspend Muslim immigration into the United States immediately. Why?  Because Muslims bring with them a totalitarian ideology that calls for the  submission of the United States to Islam and Sharia law. Pew released its  findings yesterday on its worldwide survey of Muslims, and revealed that  two-thirds of Middle Eastern Muslims believe in the death penalty for any Muslim  who converts to Christianity, and one-third believe in suicide bombings. This is  not a religion of peace or liberty. Every tenet of Islam is fundamentally,  irreversibly, subversively and implacably hostile to every value we cherish in  America.

Muslim immigrants bring with them a totalitarian ideology whose holy book  calls for the followers of Allah to “slay the idolaters wherever you find them”  (Sura 9:5). The more devout a Muslim becomes, the more likely he is to obey such  a command, as Tamerlan Tsarnaev illustrates, and the more of a threat he becomes  to the security of the United States and the safety of the American people.

When I first began calling for an end to Muslim immigration in 2009, I was  virtually a lone voice crying in the wilderness. But Andy McCarthy has since  called for the suspension of immigration from Muslim majority nations, and Frank  Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy has called for precluding  “shariah-adherent Muslims” from our shores, in a fashion similar to our post  WWII ban on immigrants who adhered to communist ideology.

Since the Boston Muslim Massacre, Laura Ingraham has called for a ban on  Muslim immigration, and more significantly, John McCain just yesterday suggested  restrictions on immigration from countries with a “significant influence of  radical Islamic extremism.” Both Marco Rubio and Rand Paul have openly called  for considering the suspension of student visas to Muslim males. Suspending  Muslim immigration to the United States is an idea whose time has come.

Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders, based on Europe’s bitter experience with  virtually unrestricted Muslim immigration, has been calling for this for years,  and imploring America to wake up and small the Sharia before we become we seal  our doom. Of course, the majority of Muslim immigrants do not want to kill  us, but they are not the Muslims we have to worry about. The problem is we have  no way of distinguishing the Muslims we do have to worry about from the ones we  don’t. And we can’t watch them all.

Dzokhar Tsarnaev is a case in point. All of his friends and classmates said  he was quiet, fun, one of us, and so forth. They all expressed shock that he  went jihad on Americans. The only way to have prevented him from participating  in the Boston Muslim Massacre would have been not to allow him in the country in  the first place. While this may seem unfair to Muslims who have no hostile  intentions toward us, that is not our fault. The blame for such a blanket policy  lies with the Muslims who do have hostile intentions toward us and have been  responsible for no less than 55 terrorist attempts on our soil since 9/11. If  friendly Muslims are looking for someone to blame for being unable to enter the  U.S., that is where their finger should point.

Is banning Muslim immigration constitutional? Of course it is. No one has a  right, constitutional or otherwise, to immigrate to the United States. In our  system of government, immigration rules are the exclusive province of Congress.  One of its express powers of action, as set forth in Article I, Section 8, is  “To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization.” In Kleindienst v. Mandel  (1972), (Mandel was a Marxist ideologue) the Supreme Court affirmed that “the  power to exclude aliens is ‘inherent in sovereignty, necessary for maintaining  normal international relations and defending the country against foreign  encroachments and dangers – a power to be exercised exclusively by the political  branches of government’ . . . .The Court without exception has sustained  Congress’ ‘plenary power to make rules for the admission of aliens and to  exclude those who possess those characteristics which Congress has  forbidden’…[O]ver no conceivable subject is the legislative power of Congress  more complete than it is over the admission of aliens’…The power of Congress to  exclude aliens altogether from the United States, or to prescribe the terms and  conditions upon which they may come to this country, and to have its declared  policy in that regard enforced exclusively through executive officers, without  judicial intervention, is settled by our previous adjudications.” (Emphasis  mine.)

Bottom line: Congress can ban Muslim immigration if it wants to. And it  should.

Author: Bryan Fischer

Read more: http://patriotupdate.com/2013/05/time-to-suspend-muslim-immigration-muslims-in-the-military-and-building-mosques-in-the-u-s/#ixzz2SGvYC2U1

Related articles

• How American Muslims Radicalize (pjmedia.com)
• I Agree With Laura, Freeze Muslim Immigration (oneway2day.wordpress.com)
• U.S. Imam Calls On Muslims In America To Wage Jihad… (iranaware.com)

Boston and America’s 200-Year-War with Islam- not to forget the worlds war with Islam

This is a repost from Gary DeMar in which was very good .

 

Posted on May  1, 2013 by Gary DeMar filed under Email Featured, History, Islam, War

64

The Boston bombings, the Fort Hood shootings, the events of 9/11, and  numerous international Islamic terrorist activities are only new to people who  have no sense of history.

Most Americans are familiar with the first line of the United States Marine  Corps hymn, “From the halls of Montezuma^[1] to the shores of Tripoli” but most likely don’t know the source of the “Tripoli”  reference. The line “to the shores of Tripoli” refers to the First Barbary War,  specifically the Battle  of Derna, that took place in 1805.

Our earliest founders were familiar with the terrorist ways of radical  Islamists. Thomas Jefferson, who was serving as the ambassador to France, and  John Adams, the Ambassador to Britain, met in London with Ambassador Abdrahaman,  the Dey of Tripoli’s ambassador to Britain, in an attempt to negotiate a peace  treaty. Peace for an Islamist means surrender to Islam.

Peace would come at a price. If America wanted “temporary peace,” a one-year  guarantee, it would cost $66,000 plus a 10% commission. “Everlasting peace” was  a bargain at $160,000 plus the obligatory commission. This only applied to  Tripoli. Other Muslim nations would also have to be paid. The amount came to  $1.3 million. But there was no assurance that the treaties would be honored. In  vain, Jefferson and Adams tried to argue that America was not at war with  Tripoli. In what way had the U.S provoked the Muslims, they asked? Ambassador  Abdrahaman went on to explain “the finer points of Islamic jihad” to the  Koranically challenged Jefferson and Adams. In a letter to John Jay, Jefferson  wrote the following:

“The Ambassador answered us that it was founded  on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all  nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it  was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and  to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman  [Muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”^[2]

Abdrahaman was paraphrasing the Koran’s “rules of engagement” found in the 47  Surah: “Whenever you encounter the ones who disbelieve [during wartime], seize  them by their necks until once you have subdued them, then tie them up as  prisoners, either in order to release them later on, or also to ask for ransom,  until war lays down her burdens.”

Decatur Boarding Tripolitan Gunboat

Unless a nation submits to Islam — whether it was the aggressor or not — that  nation was by definition at war with Islam. Jihad means “to submit.” A  non-aggressing nation is still at war with Islam as long as it hasn’t embraced  Islam. Islam’s goal is to conquer the world, either by the submission of one’s  will or by Allah’s sword.

Paul Johnson writes:

“Koranic teaching that the faith or ‘submission’  can be, and in suitable circumstances must be, imposed by force, has never been  ignored. On the contrary, the history of Islam from Arabia was followed by the  rapid conquest of North Africa, the invasion and virtual conquest of Spain, and  a thrust into France that carried the crescent to the gates of Paris. It took  half a millennium or reconquest to expel the Moslems from Western Europe. The  Crusades, far from being an outrageous prototype of Western imperialism, as is  taught in most of our schools, were a mere episode in a struggle that has lasted  1,400 years and were one of the few occasions when Christians took the offensive  to regain the “occupied territories” of the Holy Land.”^[3]

When President Jefferson refused to increase the tribute demanded by  the Islamists, Tripoli declared war on the United States. A United States navy  squadron, under Commander Edward Preble, blockaded Tripoli from 1803 to 1805.  After rebel soldiers from Tripoli, led by United States Marines, captured the  city of Derna, the Pasha of Tripoli signed a treaty promising to exact no more  tribute.

President Obama is not the first person who has tried to whitewash Islam’s  history and sell us on the peaceful motives of Muslims. Rep. Keith Ellison  (D-Minn.), a Muslim, took his constitutional oath on Jefferson’s copy of the  Koran. How ironic given Jefferson’s disdain for Islam’s double dealings.

Jefferson, embroiled in a war with Islamic terrorists in his day, commented,  “Too long, for the honor of nations, have those Barbarians been suffered  [permitted] to trample on the sacred faith of treaties, on the rights and laws  of human nature!”^[4] Little has changed since Jefferson’s day.

Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/05/boston-and-americas-200-year-war-with-islam/#ixzz2SB0Q1E5B

Time to Start Profiling Muslims Instead of Christians

Exactly we should have been doing this all along but  no the would not be politically correct– bull — the wolves are in the flock hiding and waiting for you to turn your back and they will pounce .  This  government is opening the borders to all ,so come , become a citizen of the U.S. coexist  live the American dream , bring your religion of peace . Is there something wrong with us ? We have been so influenced by This Government and the main stream media with the lies. They have put blinders on us . I have not in my 60+ years seen a more corrupt government , I am not ashamed of the United States—- I am ashamed of what has become of our Government . We are getting closer to communism than you think . Look at the attacks

  

By Rick  David / 22 April  2013 / 85  Comments    around the world .

On  Monday, as I heard the news of the Boston Marathon bombing, I heard some  lame-brained reporter on the radio claim that, “this changes everything.” His  follow-up was something about none of us being safe anymore. My first thought  was, “What! Where has this guy been since 9/11?”

But then, I remembered that many Americans, led by politicians and the media,  have accepted the notion that we are no longer threatened by Islamic jihad. They  have been lulled to sleep by the lie that Islam is a “religion of peace.” With  the killing of Bin Laden and our withdrawal from wars in Iraq and Afghanistan,  they have been convinced by the campaign rhetoric that “Bin Laden is dead and GM  is alive.” We are under the impression that we have been kept safe from Islamic  jihad since 9/11, forgetting that the Ft Hood shooter was named Hasan and  shouted, “allahyu akkbar.” That incident has been forgotten because the  “enlightened” administration has labeled it “work place violence.” Until this  week, Obama had dropped the term “Islamic terrorism” from his lexicon.

How fitting is it that the two brothers both ended up at Beth Israel Hospital  in the caring arms of JEWS!!!!!? Now we will be subjected to a societal anal  exam for weeks on end because of our self-loathing liberal political correctness  which values “diversity” more than truth.

The main stream media is perplexed. “How could such nice boys have lived here  for so long, become radicalized and done this? How do we prevent this? How can  we be safe?” They refuse to accept that Islam is incompatible with western  society. Every Muslim is a “person of interest”. We will be safer once we accept  the truth. The truth will set you free. We must profile these people. The  nitwits in the media and political class must stop perpetrating the lie that  Islam is a religion of peace.

The reason we are not safe is because our society operates in a fantasy  perpetuated by a government sympathetic to a religion of death. How blind are we  when the terrorists are identified  two years in advance and we ignore it?1 How appropriate is it that the car  that the terrorists hijacked had that familiar COEXIST bumper sticker? When will  we wake up and realize that these people do not want to co-exist with us?

This week a friend of a friend commented on Facebook that “99% of the people  of the world are good.” I had to remind him that there are millions of Muslims  in the world who want us dead simply because we are Americans, Christians or  Jews. He then equated radical Islam to the Westboro Baptists. There is no  comparing radical Islam to any other religion (except perhaps Satan worship). I  don’t recall the Westboro Baptists killing anyone. They may be intolerant  bigots, but they are not murderers. The two don’t equate.

Our country would be safer if people paid more attention to Robert Spencer  than Barrack Obama or Chris Matthews. You say, “Who is Robert Spencer?” Of  course you wouldn’t know because his thorough efforts to document Islamic  terrorism have been deliberately ignored by the media. If you want to know what  these murderers are up to, you will be more informed by following Spencer’s Jihad Watch website than any newspaper or  television station. The sheer volume of Islamic terrorism that has occurred  since 9/11 will astound you

Read more:  http://clashdaily.com/2013/04/time-to-start-profiling-muslims-instead-of-christians/#ixzz2RQ5aDU73 Get more Clash on ClashDaily.com,  Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.

Related articles

• Us and Islamophobia (opinion-maker.org)
• The Islamophobes Latest Fantasy Rape Fatwa (loonwatch.com)
• U.S. Army Equates Catholicism and Evangelical Christianity with al-Qaeda and Hamas (frontpagemag.com)
• Muslim (Social) Terrorism. (defendthemodernworld.wordpress.com)
• Free Book in PDF: “Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery” by M A Khan (themuslimissue.wordpress.com)
• ‘Christians! Christians! Christians!’: Muslim Mob In Egypt Screaming ‘Allahu Akbar’ Rape Christian Women In Broad Daylight (midnightwatcher.wordpress.com)
• Why Do So Many Muslims Embrace Terror and Warfare? (iranaware.com)
• Islam is the Ultimate Sleeper Cell (iranaware.com)
• Pastor: Beware of Stealth Jihad (radio.foxnews.com)
• JIHAD WATCH…Toronto jihad plot: would-be mass murderers were “religious men” (jericho777.wordpress.com)

Is It Muslim Terrorism Yet?

Not yet — maybe fun place violence  – just a couple of kids letting off steam (pressure cooker)  — maybe  just a couple of mislead people who slipped to the cracks of society , or just maybe they were mistreated at home ,probably a abusive mother , HELL NO  YOU IDIOTS IF IT SMELLS LIKE A MUSLIM AND ACTS LIKE A MUSLIM WHO ATTACKS AND MANES PEOPLE —-SHIT —IT MUST BE A TERRORIST , WWHY ARE WE AFRAID TO SAY IT , THEY ARE FRIGGIN TERRORIST. JUST WATCH FOR A MOSQUE COMING CLOSE TO  YOU.

 

Posted on April  20, 2013 by Tad Cronn filed under Crime, Email Featured, Immigration, Islam, Liberalism, National  Security, Patriotism, Religion, Terrorism

247

Oh, it’s just a couple of typical American kids — that was Michael Moore’s  reaction.

The American system twisted a couple of good Chechen boys — from the  president of Chechnya.

The two boys suspected in the Boston Marathon bombings were angels who are  being set up by American officials — the bombing suspects’ parents and aunt  said  that.

But Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were not typical, they weren’t angels and  regardless of their citizenship status they were clearly Muslim first.

The Boston bombings were terrorism. If the brothers did what they are accused  of, then they were terrorists.

Despite Chris Matthews’, Michael Moore’s and the rest of the Left’s fervent  hopes, all indications are that this was Muslim terrorism. Again.

Move on to Big Excuse, Stage Two.

Now we’re hearing about how the Tsarnaev boys mysteriously fell under the  influence of an “extreme version” of Islam.

The only problem with that statement is that there is no “non-extreme”  version of Islam.

It seems likely that the Tsarnaevs simply read the Quran:

“Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah.” — 4:76

“Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and  those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their  persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with  their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith)  Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished  above those who sit (at home) by a special reward.” — 4:95

“I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore  strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.” — 8:12

“And fight with them until there is no more fitna (unbelief) and  religion should be only for Allah.” — 8:39

“So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters  wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait  for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the  poor-rate, leave their way free to them.” — 9:5

Etc. Unlike verses in the Old Testament calling for violence, the Quranic  verses are all open-ended commandments for all time, not tied to a particular  place, time and situation that occurred in the past.

Islam was and remains the only major world religion founded by a warlord.  Mohammed’s historical career included long periods of banditry and conquest in  which he himself participated. The Quran and the Hadith bear the indelible stamp  of the founder of Islam’s foul temper and proclivity toward violence as the  first and last resort to solving problems. Unlike Christianity, to which it is  often wrongly compared, Islam is meant to be spread by perpetual warfare across  the whole world.

While politicians dither about whether to use the word “terrorism” and warn  against labeling groups, and while the media and the family of the suspects make  excuses to deflect responsibility, the simple truth seems to be that the two  young men were raised in a toxic faith, they grew up and they took Islam  seriously.

Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/04/is-it-terrorism-yet/#ixzz2REbTDF43

Related articles

• Muslims beg Allah, “Please don’t let it be a Muslim.” But the Quran specifically instructs all Muslims to terrorize unbelievers: Islam is the Quran. (ofthehighest.wordpress.com)
• Terrorism — Boston Marathon Bombing: an Answer to the Muslim Apologists on Every Media Outlet … (onecitizenspeaking.com)
• Muslim Leaders: We Stand Against Terrorism (praiserichmond.com)
• Obama’s Never-Ending Defense of Islam Ensures More Bombing Attacks (vineoflife.net)
• Islam is the Ultimate Sleeper Cell (iranaware.com)
• Islam – The Liberal Lies (sardonicablog.com)
• We Are Not Serious About Stopping Islamic Terror (americanthinker.com)
• Help stop/limit Muslim immigration into YOUR country (guide) (iranaware.com)
• Bill Maher: ‘Liberal Bullsh**’ to Compare Islamic Terror to Christianity (breitbart.com)

Islamic Nations: ‘Legitimate Struggle’ Not Terror

             simple   BULLSHIT

 

 

 

 

           

---

Print ArticleSend a Tip

            by             Anne Bayefsky                  21 Apr 2013, 7:14 AM PDT

Addressing the nation on Friday evening about the actions of the Boston terrorists, President Barack Obama posed the question “why.”  After all, the suspects had been direct beneficiaries of American largesse, including a successful asylum application, a green card and citizenship.

Clues, however, are not nearly as concealed as the President made out. Look west to United Nations Headquarters in New York City, just a few hours away.

At exactly the same time that the Tsarnaev brothers were building their bombs and planning their attack, Islamic front men at the UN were demanding that the organization define terrorism with an exception clause for “legitimate struggle.”

In 2013 the United Nations still has no definition of terrorism. For over a decade, a committee involving all UN states has been charged with drafting a so-called comprehensive convention against terrorism and producing a definition. But year-after-year the effort is thwarted by Islamic countries that want no legal impediments to murder in the name of “self-determination” or “national liberation.”

On April 12, after a week of negotiations, the UN issued a summary of the stumbling blocks, highlighting in particular the position of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). The summary includes:  “Several delegations emphasized the need to distinguish terrorism from the legitimate struggle of peoples under colonial or alien domination and foreign occupation in the exercise of their right of self-determination.”

Representatives from Egypt, Iran, Kuwait, Malaysia, Pakistan, Algeria, Syria, and Iraq, had taken the floor to press the case for such exclusions–exclusions that would gut any genuine prohibition.

Instead of seriously denouncing terror, these speakers sought to divert attention to “the root causes of terrorism.” As Egypt explained, on behalf of the 56 states of the OIC, “root causes” “include…political and economic injustices, and political marginalization.”

In short, the game plan of the Islamic group is to fuel a manufactured sense of grievance that breeds terrorists–whether they live in Boston or Chechnya or anywhere else.

It doesn’t matter whether Tamerlan or Dzhokhar Tsarnaev ever took the usual American school trip to the United Nations. The poisonous ideology of Islamic countries that is continually broadcast unimpeded from the UN’s global stage is ubiquitous.

This is not, however, part of the answer that President Obama was evidently seeking when he asked “why did young men who grew up and studied here as part of our communities and our country resort to such violence?” On the contrary, as has been characteristic of his presidency, he immediately attempted to muzzle discussion of the potential role of the brothers Tsarnaev’s faith by suggesting it would somehow be incompatible with our country’s spirit of “diversity.”

The President proceeded to warn Americans not to “jump to conclusions”–and then quickly assumed that their reaction to learning the religious identity of the suspects would be xenophobic. He purported to praise citizens for their “welcom[ing] spirit,” but presupposed their first response would be intolerance–prompting a second admonition in his brief remarks “not to rush to judgment.”

In reality, the fans who spontaneously belted out the national anthem at a Boston hockey game, the many millions more who tearfully watched them from afar, or who lined the streets of Watertown waving flags at the passing police cars, did not need a lecture from their President about what it means to be an American.

The diplomats at the United Nations were content to wrap up their session by agreeing to meet again next year to talk about a definition of terrorism. Bostonians, and their fellow Americans, are cut from a different cloth. They will reject any attempt to excise or deny the important particulars of hatred.

Related articles

• The Obama Administration’s Love Affair With Islam (conservativesonfire.wordpress.com)
• U.S. Government Files Motion to Dismiss Lawsuit that Claims it Helps Fund Palestinian Terror (algemeiner.com)
• Largest Islamic World Body calls for global law against criticizing Muhammad (atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com)

Will the Real National Socialists Please Own Up?

Written on Sunday, April 14, 2013 by Marilyn  Assenheim

“Projection.” Psychology defines this term as accusing others of thoughts,  intentions or actions that are, in reality, what they themselves, think, intend,  or do.

Democrats have accused the right of being Nazis for ages (remember  Bush=Hitler?). Last year saw Nikki Haley accused of channeling Eva Braun, Paul  Ryan linked with Josef Goebbels’ “big lie” and so on. Pure projection.   Democrats might consider being careful about hollering “Nazism” at others;  the “Nazi” shoe appears to fit Democrats better than the glass slipper fit  Cinderella.  National Socialism is a charged label. And just like the  original Party, it gets traction from the top down.

The time has come to remove our politically correct blinkers and have the  honesty to declare who has really adopted the tenets of National Socialism.  America’s future depends on it.

National Socialists, for example, relied on unions. Membership was,  theoretically, voluntary but union activity was instrumental in cementing  National Socialist control of Germany. Mandatory dues raised millions of  Deutschmarks, annually, for the National Socialist Party. It became difficult to  get a job without being a union member. The blind devotion unions (e.g. SEIU,  Teamsters, teachers unions) grant the Democrat party is comparable. Democrats  are, in return, staunch advocates of union dominance. Democrat candidates from  the top down get enormous amounts of cash and support from unions. Vilification,  even physical assault on non-union employees has become depressingly common.  Elections are hijacked and state officials are forced into recall elections by  union strong-arm tactics. Obamacare promotes unionization of the health care  industry (including physicians). Such Brown Shirt tactics aren’t being  perpetrated by the GOP; they are the result of escalating Democrat harassment.  The irony is, apparently, lost on the true perpetrators. The DAF (German Labor  Front) was born biased against capitalism and advocated that large companies be  nationalized by the German state. Sound familiar? Think General Motors. Think  health care. The Fuhrer-In-Chief isn’t done yet

A primary doctrine of National Socialism was all about “redistribution of  wealth.” National Socialism ascended when Germany’s economy was not just  circling the drain but had become solidly lodged in the toilet. “Hope and  change” was pledged to revive Germany’s glory. Today’s Democrat Party is  systematically destroying the U.S. economy after gaining power. The president is  still blaming the GOP for his own, raging profligacy. National Socialism sought  national ascendency. The Democrat Party . . . descent. Same methods, different  results. Both intentional.

The media was National Socialism’s most powerful, internal tool, fabricating  “news” out of whole cloth in support of the Nazi regime. Terrifyingly, no  discernible difference exists today. The “mainstream media” was even discovered  submitting prospective stories to the White House for approval. The Democrat  Party invents whatever fantasies advance their agenda and a collusive media  hammers us with them even after the lies are exposed by fact checkers. Reich  Minister of Propaganda, Jay Carney, attempts to pass off unpopular elements of  the regime’s latest budget as GOP ideas. Concern about journalistic malpractice  is non-existent.  So untouchable does the press consider itself that they  lie about criminal activity carried out on behalf of the current regime and  suppress factual information.

The president adopted “Forward” as a 2012 campaign slogan. “Forward” a  Marxist catchphrase in origin. It was also a favorite of Hitler’s. “Vorwartz”  (forward) was the name of a National Socialist newspaper, employed by Hitler.  The only good news is that there are (still) news sources other than the  mainstream media. Without them news that does not fit the regime’s template  would have no platform. Serious effort is underway, however, to silence  alternative media voices. The president is within inches of taking control of  the internet. The Lyin’ King has, time and again, committed unlawful and  unconstitutional acts. Yet the media coverage he receives remains  reverential.

National Socialism rejected any religion other than a secular, unconditional  devotion to the state. We’re getting there. Six million Jews were exterminated.  Most people are no longer aware that Catholics, too, were rounded up for a  one-way stay at concentration camps during WWII. Remember the Democrat  convention? Their agenda was pre-approved by the president. Democrat-sanctioned  mentions of G-d had to be shoe-horned in, via amendment to the official agenda,  contrary to the very vocal “Nay’s!” from most of the Democrat delegates. After  three, unacceptable votes, the mayor of Los Angeles peremptorily ruled a “2/3  majority” in favor of the Almighty’s backhanded invitation to the circus; a  pitiable joke. The Supreme Court struck down the federal government’s attempt to  select ministers for churches, in 2012. It’s no coincidence the president has  deliberately misquoted the Declaration of Independence on several occasions,  intentionally excising the word “G-d.” He even demanded that “INRI” (Iesus  Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum/Jesus of Nazareth King of the Jews) be covered before  agreeing to speak at Georgetown University . . . a Catholic institution.

National Socialism’s allies in the Middle East during WWII were Muslim  leaders. Democrats today have made the same choice. Throwing Israel, our only  democratic ally in the Middle East, under the bus was just the beginning. The  “understandable outrage” on display in dozens of Muslim countries is a perfect  example of “the big lie” by which Democrats live. The president and his entire  administration lied persistently, shamelessly, about Benghazi. Americans were  expected to believe that 27 countries were sparked to “spontaneous” outrage by a  ridiculous video simply because the Lyin’ King insisted it was so. Even when  evidence contrary to official story surfaced and the narrative flipped 180  degrees the president apparently didn’t get the memo. He mulishly refused to use  the word “terrorism.” His United Nations address self-righteously insisted the  video was the fire-starter.  His then-Secretary-of-State, Hillary Clinton, has  been exposed as a duplicitous fraud in the matter. Yet the media is  enthusiastically flogging her candidacy for president in 2016.

The precedents for the policies being inflicted on America today were created  in WWII Germany. It is clear which party is a replica of National Socialism. It  is even more evident which party, despite the lie being big enough and repeated  often enough, isn’t.

Read more: http://patriotupdate.com/articles/will-the-real-national-socialists-please-own-up/#ixzz2QZXcZqlO

Related articles

• Top Muslim socialist in Sweden had Hitler as idol (ivarfjeld.com)
• ‘Forward!’ They Cried (americanthinker.com)
• Once and for all: The leftist origins of National Socialism (thecommentator.com)

Obama Disarms Americans While Arming Our Somalian and Egyptian Enemies

Do you think after this last 4 years that this guy is a traitor to the UNITED STATES and should be impeached and brought up on treason charges ?

 

Posted  11  hours ago by Dave Jolly filed under Crime, Gun Control, Military, National  Security, Politics, World News

Last year, President Barack Obama began sending  arms and fighter  jets to Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood leadership.  It didn’t seem to  matter to him that many in the Muslim Brotherhood, including Egypt’s President  Morsi have vowed to seek the destruction of America.  Against the wishes of  Congress, Obama  ordered the freeing of millions of dollars to Egypt that Congress had frozen  because of their terrorist actions.

Within days of the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, Obama began his  campaign to disarm Americans.  In the guise of preventing more violence  like Sandy Hook, Aurora, Virginia Tech and Columbine, Obama is pushing a number  of bills that are direct violations of the Second Amendment, but he doesn’t care  about the Constitution anyway, does he!

Like a wolf in sheep’s clothing, Obama repeatedly tells the American people  that he has no intention of disarming them entirely.  He just wants to ban  assault and assault-style weapons because they are involved in so many shootings  like Sandy Hook.  What he doesn’t tell the American people is that rifles  in general account for only 3% of gun violence and that assault – assault-style  rifles are a subset of that 3%.

Earlier this week, Obama  mocked and jeered the accusations that he was planning to ban all  guns.  However, we all know that truth is often hidden in jest.  Other  countries that disarmed their citizens started the process in a similar way and  we’ve seen what happened there.

This week, Obama launched a vigorous anti-gun campaign in an effort to get  the public to put pressure on Congress to pass the anti-gun laws in the Senate  and House.  He has even resorted to exploiting some of the families of the  Sandy Hook victims, parading them around and flying them on Air Force One at our  expense.  Short of making dictatorial rulings, which would not be  surprising at this stage of the game, Obama will stop at nothing to get these  anti-Constitutional laws passed.

While he is pushing to disarm Americans, Obama turns around and uses a  ‘presidential determination’ to allow for funding  of weapons and services to Somalia.  Obama said he made the decision  because he believes it will help the US and promote world peace (was he a beauty  contest contestant in a movie somewhere?) by helping the Somalian government  fight against the Al-Shabaab terrorists.

Newly appointed Secretary of State John Kerry has been given the task of  determining what weapons and equipment the US will make available to the  Somalian government.

The problem I see with this is that weapons we supplied to Egypt are now  being used to persecute and rid the nation of Christians.  The weapons we  supplied to help Libyan rebels are now being used by Islamic terrorists in  places like Syria.

But why is Obama so all fired set on supplying arms to people that hate us  and have vowed to destroy us while at the same time pushing to disarm the  American people?  The answer that seems viable is that he has an agenda to  conquer the US and to either turn it into an Islamic state or socialist state,  or perhaps a socialist Islamic state if that is possible.

Can there be any other explanation for Obama’s actions?

Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/04/obama-disarms-americans-while-arming-our-somalian-and-egyptian-enemies/#ixzz2QO1Fd9ea

Related articles

• Obama Mockingly Tells Americans What He’ll Do With Gun Control Laws (godfatherpolitics.com)
• Texas Democrat Tells Crowd That Total Gun Ban Is Coming Soon (godfatherpolitics.com)
• Texas College Stabbings Prove Guns Aren’t the Problem (godfatherpolitics.com)
• The Lack of Moral Authority the US Government Has Pushing for Gun Control. (thelonestarwatchdog.com)

State Dept has “ramped up” programs to bring Muslim students to US

 

Posted on March 6, 2013 by creeping

That’s a roundabout way of saying they are importing Muslims to the U.S. via US aims to engage Muslim world via higher education | MuslimVillage.com. h/t halalporkshop

The idea of “education diplomacy” has “really arrived” at the highest levels of American foreign policy, a US State Department official has told an international higher education conference.

Meghann Curtis, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Academic Programs at the US Department of State’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, said that the bureau had always been driven by the notion that “we’d be a more stable, peaceful and prosperous world if we could all get to know one another”. But she said that the issue had recently become “incredibly important”.

Engagement with the Middle East and North Africa, and other Muslim-majority countries, was a top priority to address a “big deficit” in mutual understanding, she said in a round-table session, “The importance of academic exchange in foreign affairs” at the Association of International Education Administrators annual conference in New Orleans.

“I was having a conversation with folks at the White House, in the policy shop over there, and this idea of education diplomacy has really arrived,” she said.

She also said programmes to bring students and scholars from Muslim-majority countries into the US had been “ramped up”.

Educational diplomacy, plunder, taxation for Islamization, creeping sharia…call it whatever you want. It does nothing for American citizens who are being robbed by corrupt politicians and social engineers. No mention on how much this is costing taxpayers.

Also recall that Obama ended restrictions on Saudis entering U.S., 60% increase since 2010 and the State Dept is Recruiting Muslim Foreign Service Officers at Jihadist Conferences.

Get the hint?

Related articles

• State Dept. Recruits Jihadists to Join Foreign Service (godfatherpolitics.com)
• Atheists face increased discrimination around the world (thecommentator.com)
• What ever happened to Nidal Hasan? And what is Education Diplomacy? (askmarion.wordpress.com)
• State Dept. Recruits Jihadists to Join Foreign Service (givemeliberty01.com)